By Renato Cristin (auth.)
Heidegger holds that our age is ruled via the ambition of cause to own the realm. And he sees in Leibniz the guy who formulated the concept of our smooth age: not anything occurs with out a cause. He calls this angle `calculating concept' and opposes to it a type of concept geared toward keeping the essence of items, which he calls `meditating thought'. Cristin's publication ascribes nice significance to this polarity of considering for the way forward for modern philosophy, and hence compares the fundamental rules of the 2 thinkers. Leibniz pronounces the conquest of cause; Heidegger denounces the hazards of cause. Their variety turns into take place within the distinction among the belief of cause and clone of the trail.
yet is Leibniz's idea particularly simply `calculating'? And will we no longer probably additionally come upon the strains of cause alongside Heidegger's direction? With those questions in brain we may possibly start to redefine the relation among the 2 thinkers and among varied conceptions of cause and philosophy. The speculation is complicated that Heidegger's harsh judgment of Leibniz should be mitigated, however it additionally turns into transparent that Heidegger's rewriting of the code of cause is an essential component of our age, within which many symptoms element to new loci of rationality.
along with his unique interpretation, conscious of the hazards he takes, Renato Cristin deals a brand new advisor to the knowledge of cause: he indicates forth Leibniz as person who defends the concept of being within the team spirit of monadology, and Heidegger as a philosopher who preserves the signal of cause in his meditating thought.
Read or Download Heidegger and Leibniz: Reason and the Path with a Foreword by Hans Georg Gadamer PDF
Best phenomenology books
The vintage perception of human transcendental recognition assumes its self-supporting existential prestige in the horizon of life-world, nature and earth. but this assumed absoluteness doesn't entail the character of its powers, neither their constitutive strength. This latter demand an existential resource attaining past the generative life-world community.
1 technology and man
2 technology and phenomenology
3 The plan of this work
4 'Geographical phenomenology'
5 The disciplinary context
PART I GEOGRAPHY and conventional METAPHYSICS
Geographical discourse and its valuable themes
6 simple thoughts of technological know-how and the strategy acceptable to ontology
7 Objectivism and subjectivism
8 Positivism and naturalism
8a The a-historical nature of positivism
8b The Enlightenment and positivism
8c Naturalism and idealism
9 Kantian ontology of fabric nature
10 Conceptions of actual area and geography
10a The emergence of geography as an summary, theoretical science
10b Social physics
11 actual house, cognitive behaviouralism and the flip to subjectivity
12 The mode of being attribute of geographical objects
PART II GEOGRAPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGY
The interpretation of phenomenology in geography
13 The phenomenological foundation of geography
14 Geographical phenomenology
14a Phenomenology and functional research
15 techniques to geographical phenomenology
15a the mandatory contrast among humanism and geography
16 The view of science
16a Phenomenology as criticism
16b Phenomenology as anti-science
16c The foundational function of phenomenology
16d Phenomena of lived experience
17 The flip to the lifeworld, and the anomaly of flooring and object
18 The phenomenological method
Geographical phenomenology: a critique of its foundations
19 The metaphysics of geographical phenomenology
20 Humanism and the confusion of the 'objective' and the 'subjective'
20a Subjectivity and intentionality
20c The 'things themselves', 'consciousness' and 'the challenge of the target world'
21 Geographical phenomenology: its inner critique
21a Phenomenology and standards of validity
22 The flip to Schiitz's constitutive phenomenology and justifying a go back to Husserl
PART III PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE query OF HUMAN SCIENCE
Husserlian phenomenology: the foundational project
23 what's phenomenology?
23a Phenomenology: its origins and foundations
23b The typical attitude
23c Empirical technology and natural science
23d unique intuition
23c Phenomena and intentionality
24 the necessity for phenomenology
24a The main issue of distance among technological know-how and life
24b The critique of the confident sciences
24c The constitution of the area and 'objects' of science
24d Phenomenology and the guiding notion of science
Phenomenology, technological know-how and phenomenological geography
25 Descriptive phenomenology and science
25a Sciences of truth and sciences of essence
25b Descriptive phenomenology
26 Phenomenology, technological know-how and lifeworld
26a The lifeworld ontology
26b The sciences and the lifeworld
26c The technology of the lifeworld
26d Lifeworld and transcendental phenomenology
Towards a primary ontology of science
27 Phenomenology and a basic ontology of science
28 technological know-how and objectivation in geography
28a How does theoretical discovery arise?
28b the typical international and the theoretical attitude
29 the improvement of technology and the concept that of 'progress'
30 Human technological know-how and objectification
31 Rigour and exactitude in science
32 concept and its succeed in and carry over nature and world
33 technological know-how and the lived world
PART IV HUMAN technological know-how, WORLDHOOD, AND SPATIALITY
Implications for the human sciences and a human technology of geography
35 Phenomenology and the technology of geography
36 in the direction of a proper projective human science
37 Husserl and human science
38 in the direction of a proper and a priori 'mathesis of spiritand of humanity'
39 The existential analytic and the human sciences
40 The existential analytic and the 'natural perception of the world' (or lifeworld)
Towards an knowing of human spatiality
41 Geography, global and space
42 global and worldhood
43a The technological view of space
43b The spatiality of the present-at-hand
44 the standard mode of being-in-the-world
45 The spatiality of the ready-to-hand: areas and regions
46 house and science
47 Man's spatiality
48 house and man's spatiality
49 position and area: implications for a local ontology of spatiality for a geographical human technological know-how
Emmanuel Lévinas est le philosophe de los angeles non-indifférence; il n’est en aucune sorte un philosophe indifférent. Son inquiétude personnelle et engagement politique ont trouvé une expression philosophique dans une quête � deux versants. Dans le versant ontologique, il cherche � montrer que même si l’homme est l’événement de compréhension de l’être, tout l’homme et toute signification ne se réduisent pas � los angeles compréhension de l’être seul.
FranÃ§ois Raffoul methods the concept that of accountability in a way that's exact from its conventional interpretation as responsibility of the willful topic. Exploring accountability within the works of Nietzsche, Sartre, Levinas, Heidegger, and Derrida, Raffoul identifies decisive moments within the improvement of the concept that, retrieves its origins, and explores new reflections on it.
- Athens and Jerusalem
- Merleau-Ponty's philosophy
- Nietzsche and phenomenology : power, life, and subjectivity
- William James and Phenomenology: A Study of the Principles of Psychology
Extra resources for Heidegger and Leibniz: Reason and the Path with a Foreword by Hans Georg Gadamer
54/97). The organization of a perceptual field likewise characterizes behavior, for different situational responses occur to the same bodily excitation. We react to stimuli holistically, and in different situations they will assume different meanings for the bodily organism. The reflex is not the product of preexisting stimuli because there is a reversibility between the two such that the reflex “turns back upon” the stimuli and gives them a meaning that derives from the entire situation (PhP 79/94).
The reflex is not the product of preexisting stimuli because there is a reversibility between the two such that the reflex “turns back upon” the stimuli and gives them a meaning that derives from the entire situation (PhP 79/94). Therefore, subjective intentions and objective properties are thoroughly mixed up with each other and comprise “a new whole” (SC 13/11). For Merleau-Ponty, this “mixed-upness” implies that perception and behavior are intelligible sense-giving activities that evidence a pre-reflective motor intentionality anterior to the intervention of conscious acts or reflective constitutions of meaning.
Moreover, beyond the subject of Nature, Descartes is present in Merleau-Ponty’s writings from one end to the other. Indeed, the notes found on his desk the evening of the day he died dealt with Descartes (ESA II: 23), in all probability because the subject of Merleau-Ponty’s last course at the Collège de France was “Cartesian Ontology and Ontology Today” (January-April 1961). How to explain this Cartesian preeminence in Merleau-Ponty’s thought? Almost all explanations focus on Merleau-Ponty’s many (justified) criticisms of Decartes.
Heidegger and Leibniz: Reason and the Path with a Foreword by Hans Georg Gadamer by Renato Cristin (auth.)